www site     

pearceyreport.jpg
Order "Saving Leonardo" Here
Nancy Pearcey Saving Leonardo Google for Blog 1.jpg Saving Leonardo -- Banner from Cover 234x60.jpg
Fujimura: "Feast for the Mind and Eye"
   RSS Wednesday, Apr 16, 2014, 3:17 pm EDT
Link to us   
HomeStoreAboutTotal TruthBlogContactDonateSpeakingArchives
pro-existence banner no. 2 black by Rick and Nancy Pearcey.jpg

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Obama and Lucifer?

By Rick Pearcey • February 7, 2009, 12:16 PM

In the mail this week arrived Rules for Radicals, a "pragmatic primer for realistic radicals," written by Saul Alinsky and published in 1971.

What's striking, immediately, about this book is that Alinsky at the outset acknowledges his debt to the "very first radical," who turns out to be none other than: "Lucifer." This appears on the page preceding the table of contents.

The problem for Obama, who famously asserts that he is a "Christian," is that he appears to be in significant debt to the thinking and tactics of this man Saul Alinsky (as is noted here by an Obama opponent and here by a supporter).

The challenge for Obama -- if he wants to be understood as an authentic Christian -- is that the Lordship of Christ applies to the whole of life, including the tactics of political and social change one employs.

Methods matter far more than some people appear to realize (this challenge applies with equal force to the so-called religious right, let us say in fairness). "Thy will be done on earth as it is done in Heaven" is not a relativistic option up for vote on Capitol Hill. To be tossed aside if electoral results or fundraising pressures require.

How can an Obama, or any public figure claiming to be an authentic follower of Jesus of Nazareth, also embrace the spirit of one who is the intellectual, moral, and worldview antithesis of this same Jesus, this true Messiah verified in history?

So what's going on? Is Obama a hypocrite, a manipulator? Deeply confused? Or was Alinsky simply hyping his book for street cred and publishing attention?

Comments

I believe that Alinsky - even if 'hyping' his book - was correct in giving credit to Lucifer. After all, isn't Lucifer a pragmatist? Notice how he handled Jesus during the temptation. He is willing to concede some things so long as he can likewise achieve other things. "I'll give you glory if you honor me" or "I'll give you the world if you'll just say it belongs to me." He's willing to give up many things in order to achieve his goals.

Likewise, that is what pragmatic radicals do. They willingly compromise in some areas in order to gain in others. Obama has repeatedly called himself a pragmatist. This, in my opinion, should make him a man of questionable values. True pragmatists have no values but the ones that will help them achieve their goals - all is to be sacrificed in order to obtain those goals. That is the philosophy of Lucifer, that is the philosophy of Alinsky, and that is the philosophy of our current president, Obama.

Post a comment

Please enter the letter "f" in the field below: